Epistemological explanation of change (deconstructive analysis of change and motion)

Document Type : The scientific research paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences (Islamic Philosophy and Education), Payam-e Noor University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explain time based on the constructivist view of substantive motion. This activity has been done in a deconstruction manner. It is the deconstruction, re-reading, and analysis of any subject by decentralizing it and achieving dimensions of the subject that are often overlooked. In general, theories of time are divided into two categories: theories of substantive change, which consider change to be related only to the appearances and names and the superficial layers of the system and all its phenomena, and theories that consider time made by the substantive motion and fundamental change and evolution of phenomena. By challenging the themes in the view of the change of nature, the space was paved for the view to emerge on the constructivism of the transcendent purposeful substantive motion. According to the constructivist approach of purposeful substantive motion, all phenomena of existence, and especially human beings, are moving in the path of the Creator according to their need and poverty. The centralization of the approach to the constructivism of the substantive motion has implications for education. Thus, education is more and more a religious nature and according to the substantive motion, the universe, based on its inherent nature, needs a stimulus that is being created and invented every moment in order to be able to form a momentary identity of the world and man. And the accidental world is an inherent occurrence (not a time occurrence).

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [Persian]

تبیین معرفت شناسی تغییر( تحلیلی واسازانه درباره تغییر و حرکت )

Author [Persian]

  • حیدر اسماعیل پور
استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی ( فلسفه و تربیت اسلامی)، دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران، تهران
Abstract [Persian]

قصد این تحقیق و واکاوی، تبیین زمان بر مبنای دیدگاه برساخت گرایی حرکت جوهری است. این فعالیت با شیوه واسازی انجام شده است. واسازی،بازخوانی و تجزیه و تحلیل نمودن هر موضوعی از طریق مرکز زدایی از آن و دستیابی ابعادی از موضوع است که به طور معمول نادیده گرفته می شود. در مجموع، نظریه های زمان به دو دسته تقسیم می شوند: نظریه های تغییر ماهوی که تغییر را صرفاً مربوط به ظواهر و نام و لایه های رویین نظام هستی و تمامی پدیده های آن می دانند و نظریه هایی که زمان را برساخته حرکت جوهری وتغییر و تحول بنیادین پدیده ها در نظر می گیرند. با به چالش کشیدن مضامین مندرج در دیدگاه تغییر ماهیات، فضا برای به میدان آمدن دیدگاه بر ساخت گرایی حرکت جوهری هدفدار متعالی هموار گردید. بر اساس رویکرد برساخت گرایی حرکت جوهری هدفدار، تمام پدیده های هستی و خصوصاً انسان با توجه به نیاز و فقر وجودی سراپا در حال حرکت در مسیر خالق یگانه اند. مرکزیت یافتن رویکرد بر ساخت گرایی حرکت جوهری و بنیادین دلالتهایی برای تعلیم و تربیت دارد؛ بدین ترتیب که تعلیم و تربیت بیش از پیش ماهیتی دینی و بر طبق حرکت جوهری، جهان هستی بر اساس فقز ذاتی خود نیازمند محرک قیومی است که هر لحظه در حال آفرینش و ابداع باشد تا بتواند هویت لحظه ای و سیلانی جهان و انسان را شکل دهد و جهان حادث به حدوث ذاتی ( و نه حدوث یا قدیم زمانی) است.

Keywords [Persian]

  • تغییر
  • واسازی
  • نظام مادی
  • دنیای نامحدود
  • نظام توحیدی
The Holy Qur’an, translated by
Ayatollah Makarem Shirazi (2007). Qom:
School of Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib (AS)
Akhavan Nabavi, Ghasem (2018).
Critique and Study of Homogeneity of the
Theory of Evolution and Substantive
Motion, Ghabasat. 23rd year. Autumn.
Bagheri, Khosrow (2010). Research
Approaches and Methods in the
Philosophy of Education. Tehran: Research
Institute for Cultural and Social Studies.
Bahadori, Saeed et al. (2019). Case
study in deconstruction research
methodology as a qualitative research.
research in humanities. tenth year. second
issue. 20 consecutive. autumn and winter.
pp. 53-66
Copleston, Frederick(2017). Culture
and History of Western Philosophy,
Descartes. Translated by Ali Karbasizadeh
Esfahani. Medina Publishing Institute.
p.166.
Davari Ardakani, Reza (2010). We and
the History of Islamic Philosophy.
Publishing Organization of the Institute of
Culture and Art of Islamic Thought.
Tehran. First Edition.
Dehghani, Reza et al. (2015).
Investigating the concept of unreal (vulgar)
time in Heidegger's fundamental ontology
and his failure to overcome metaphysical
understanding. ontological researches. two
scientific-research quarterly journals.
fourth year. No. 7.
Derrida, Jacques(1981). Deconstruction
and Philosophy. John Sallis (editor,
Published by University of Chicago Prees.
1981-01-15. Chicago (1989).
Ebrahimi Dinani, Gholam Hossein
(2010). Radius of Thought and Intuition in
Suhrawardi's Philosophy. Tehran: Hekmat.
Eighth Edition
Ebrahimi Dinani, Gholam
Hossein(2007). Relationship between soul
and body. Journal of Theology and Law.
Vol. 24. Summer.
Ghorbani, Ghodratullah (2014). The
Origin and Resurrection of Man in the
Light of Mulla Sadra's Substantive Motion.
Qom University Scientific-Research
Quarterly. Eighth Year. Second Issue.
Heidegger, M. (1975). Gesamtausgabe
5: Holzwege. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio.
Heidegger, M. (1973). Kant und das
Problem der Metaphysik (GA. 3). F.W.
von Herrmann(Hrsg.). Frankfurt am
Main:Vittorio Klossterma
Karimi Gildeh et al. (2016).
Deconstructing the Concept of "Students'
Individual Differences" and Its Critique
from the Perspective of Reconstruction
Approach. Journal of Fundamentals of
Education Research. Volume 6. Number 1.
Spring and Summer. pp. 69-82.
Khosronejad, Morteza et al. (2008).
Theory of Substantive Motion:
Philosophical and Educational
Consequences. Shiraz: Quarterly Journal of
Religious Thought. Shiraz University. 29.
pp. 91-116. winter.
Malakoutikhah, Maryam et al. (2014).
Interpretation of Man Based on
Substantive Motion. Journal of Hekmat
Esra. sixth year. Consecutive. autumn.
M. J. (2009). An introduction to
childhood studies. UK: McGraw-Hill
Education/Open. University Press.
Mohammadpour, Ahmad (2017).
Contemporary research methods in the
humanities. Tehran: Phoenix.
Motahari, Morteza (1996). collection of
works. Volumes 5. 10 and 11. Tehran:
Publishing Institute
Najafi Fara, Mehdi (2015). Time in
Heidegger's existential phenomenology
and Sadra ontology. ontological researches.
Two Scientific-Research Quarterly. Fourth
Year. No. 7. Spring and Summer. pp. 41-
57.
Najba, Nafiseh (2020). Critical analysis
of the essential interpretation of
substantive motion; Comparing the views
of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. metaphysical
research. first year. number 2. Autumn and
winter.
Nasr, Mohammad Javad (2019).
Explaining the Substantive and Intentional
Motion of Man. Tehran: Scientific Journal
of the Mirror of Knowledge. Shahid
Beheshti University. Summer. pp. 61-82.
Nazari, Ehsan et al. (2019). Timing in
Heidegger's Early Thought. Scientific
Quarterly of Philosophical Research.
Volume 13. Number 27. Summer.
Oboudiyat, Abd al-Rasoul (2011).
Introduction to the System of Sadra
Wisdom. 3 vols.
Omidi, Mehdi (1397). Philosophicaleducational results of the essential motion
of the soul. https://icih.ir/wpcontent/uploads/2018/02/k2j2m2961026.p
df
Rajabi, Ahmad et al. (2015). The initial
finality of Dasein's timeliness and
openness in Heidegger's existence and
time. Philosophy. Volume 44. Number 2.
Autumn and Winter. Pp. 27 to p. 45.
Reijen, Willem van, (2009). Martin
Heidegger. Wien: UTB.
Rostami Jalilian, Hossein, (2012). A
Study of the Roots and Contexts of
Applying the Interpretation of Time in the
Thought of Bergson and Mulla Sadra.
Quarterly Journal of Religious Thought.
Shiraz University. 42. Spring 2012. pp. 97-118.
Shaghool Yousef et al. (2010). Derrida:
Deconstruction, Critique of the Western
Metaphysics to Politics, Fundamental
Western Studies. Institute of Humanities
and Cultural Studies. First Year. Second
Issue. Fall and Winter. pp. 117-197
Shirazi, Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim (Mulla
Sadra), (1964). Al-Masha’ir Tehran. Paris:
Institute of Iranian Studies.
Shirazi, Mulla Sadra (1984).
Description of Usul Kafi. Tehran: Institute
of Cultural Studies and Research
Shirazi, Mulla Sadra (1410). Tafsīr AlQur’an Al-Karim. Second Edition. Qom:
Bidar Publications.
Shirazi, Sadr al- Muti’alihin (1981). AlShawahid al-Rububiyyah. second edition.
Mashhad: University Publishing Center.
Shirazi, Sadr al-Muti’alihin, (1415).
Tafsīr of the Holy Qur’an. Second Edition.
Qom: Bidar Publications.
Sikirivwa, Mawazo Kavula (2020).
DECONSTRUCTION THEORY AND
ITS BACKGROUND. American Journal
of Humanities and Social Sciences
Research (AJHSSR). e-ISSN :2378-703X
Volume-4. Issue-4. pp-44-72.
www.ajhssr.com Research Paper
Wang, Demin (2021). Deconstruction
as a Methodology and a Way of Thinking,
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of
the requirements for the degree of Master
of Fine Arts (Communications Design)
School of Design Pratt Institute.
Wang, Demin (2002). Change and
Inconsistency. First publication.
substantive revision. Thu Feb 13, 2020.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/change/