گستره عصمت انبیاء از دیدگاه امامیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از مباحث بحث‌برانگیز، عصمت انبیا می­ باشد که از دیرزمان در بین دانشمندان اسلامی موضع بحث و اختلاف بوده است. از این رو، هر یک از فرقه ­های اسلامی در این­باره نظر متفاوت با یکدیگر دارند؛ هرچند همه­ آنها اصل عصمت انبیا را به‌طور مطلق پذیرفته­ اند. از جمله فرق اسلامی که موضوع عصمت انبیا را پذیرفته و دیدگاهی متفاوت از دیگر فرق دارد، فرقه شیعه امامیه است. تعداد اندکی از طایفه امامیه، عصمت از خطا و اشتباه در امور عادی را برای معصوم لازم نمی­ دانند و سهو و نسیان را در این امور جایز می­ دانند؛ ولی به نظر قاطبه­ حکمای امامیه، انبیا از زمان کودکی و حتی قبل از بلوغ، از همه­ گناهان صغیره و کبیره مصون­ند و از سهو و نسیان در همه­ امور معصوم می ­باشند. بر این اساس، این مقاله با هدف «شناخت و آشنایی با نظر مشهور علمای امامیه» به گستره و قلمرو عصمت انبیا می ­پردازد و به برخی شبهات پیرامون این موضوع پاسخ می­ دهد تا روشن نماید که طبق نظر مشهور امامیه که برگرفته از سخن ائمه معصومین می‌باشد، شیعه امامیه، عصمت انبیا را پذیرفته و هیچ‌گونه نقص و نسیان را در هیچ یک از امور و  مراحل زندگی این بزرگواران نمی­ پذیرد.
 
 

تازه های تحقیق

CONCLUSION

Infallibility is the final degree of faith and success and grace with which the infallibles are protected from sins and wrongdoings in the religion of God, and it is a favor from God to the one whom God knows, who clings to his infallibility, and accepting infallibility is the work of the infallible. Infallibility never prevents the power over sin, nor does it force a person to do good deeds. Infallibility from error and sin are two necessities that are necessary for the prophets; because its absence has deprived the people of trust and the Prophet cannot fulfill his mission.

Islamic scholars have accepted the infallibility of the prophets, but they differ in their quality and degree, some believe that infallibility is after Bi’thah and some say that infallibility is before Bi’thah. Also, some have considered the Prophet only as infallible from major sin and intentional sin, and some considered the Prophet as infallible from major and minor sins, inadvertence and forgetfulness.

In this research, we have considered the scope and realm of infallibility from the perspective of the Imamiyyah Shiites.

In the view of the Imamiyyah, infallibility has degrees and levels, and the infallibility of the prophets from sin and error is different. Infallibility includes two types of practical and scientific, which in the practical dimension, keeps man from sin, and in the scientific dimension protects man from ignorance, error, mistake, forgetfulness and fallacy in thought, therefore, Innocent humans have divine immunity in terms of theoretical and practical intellect; they both understand correctly and implement what they have understood correctly, and there is no defect or forgetfulness in their perceptive power and their actions are not influenced by intentional sin and rebellion. Thus, the infallible is said to be someone who has a strong spiritual power, is fully aware of the ugliness of sin, and has a strong will to moderate and control his instinctual tendencies in all circumstances

کلیدواژه‌ها


The Holy Quran.
Ibn Fāris, Ahmad ibn Zakariya (1418 AH), Mu’jam-u Maḳāyīs al-Lughah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Bābiwayh, Abu Ja'far Muhammad (2007), Al-'I'tiqādāt (Translation into Persian by: Seyed Muhammad Ali Ghale Kohnei), Tehran: Rah-e Elm.
Akbari, Reza and Mansouri, Abbas Ali (2010), “Mulla Sadra’s View on the Infallibility of the Prophets from Sin”, Quarterly Journal of Religious Thought, Shiraz University, 37: pp. 20-1.
Badpa, Mohammad Kazem (2009), Prophet of Mercy, Qom: Isra, 2nd ed.
A Group of Authors (2005), Islamic Education 2, Tehran: Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 27th ed.
Javadi Amoli, Abdullah (2009), The Behavior of the Nearests’ Death, Research: Mohammad Musaffaei, Qom: Isra, 5th ed.
Rahimuf, Afzaluddin (2010), “The Study of the Issue of the Infallibility of the Prophets from the Perspective of Sheikh Tusī and Fakhruddin Rāzī,” Toloo' Magazine, 32: pp. 74-50.
Zamani Ghomshei, Ali (2005), Revelation and Prophecy in the Qur’an, Qom: Isra, 2nd ed.
Shariati, Mohammad Taqi (1967), New Interpretation, Tehran: Sherkat-e Sahami Enteshar.
Sadeghi, Seyed Mahmoud (2010), The Counterpart of the Qur'an and Ahl al-Bayt (AS), Qom: Isra.
Sadeghi, Seyed Mahmoud (2008), The Breeze of Thought, Qom: Isra.
Sadeghi Uruzagani, Mohammad Amin (2004), Infallibility, Qom: Qom Seminary Management Center Publications.
Sadr al-Mutallahin, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (1987), Tafsīr al-Qur’an al-‘Azīm, Research: Mohammad Khajavi, Qom: Bidar, 2nd ed.
Ṭabarsī Fadlah Ibn Hassan (1981), Translation of Majmaʻ Al-Bayān fī Tafsīr Al-Qurʼan, Research: Mohammad Javad Balāghī. Tehran: Farahani
Tūsī, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1383), Tamhīd al-'Usūl, Tehran: University of Tehran.
Tūsī, Muhammad ibn Hassan (1406 AH). Al-'Iqtisād fī Mā Yata'allaq bih al-‘I'tiqād, Beirut: Dar Al-Adwā’, 2nd ed.
Abedini, Abdul Karim (2010), The Commentary of Tasnim, Qom: Isra’, volume 14, 2nd ed.
Qodsi, Ahmad (2010), The Commentary of Tasnim, Qom: Isra’, volume 3, 5th ed.
Qsīr Āmilī, Ahmad (nd), Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, Beirut: Dar 'Ihyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Mohammadi Reyshahri, Mohammad (1981), Philosophy of Revelation and Prophecy, Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
Muzaffar, Mohammad Reza (2003), Aqā’id al-Imāmīyah, Translated by Alireza Masjedjame’I, Tehran: Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 2nd ed.
Nasri, Abdullah (1986), Basics of the Mission of the Prophets in the Qur’an, Tehran: Jahad-e Daneshgahi, 2nd ed.
Waez Mohammadi, Hassan (2010), The Commentary of Tasnim, Qom: Isra’, volume 6, 8th ed.